tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8686769.post6649993170720368128..comments2016-08-22T12:00:03.978+01:00Jeremy[email protected]Blogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8686769.post-68869879087710183652007-06-14T12:21:00.000+01:002007-06-14T12:21:00.000+01:00Hi...<BR/>I've always liked your posts, but none has really applied to me like this one did. The three-circles approach practically sorts out a lot of stuff for me. Especially the implied relationship between the first two: You are not necessarily best at that thing you love doing. And what you do best may not be exactly what you'd rather be doing. And then the third: There's no point on the long run doing what you love or what you're best at if it doesn't pay you.<BR/>Godd stuff; I'll sure use it.<BR/>Thanks.temiladehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13725500556356841041[email protected]tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8686769.post-7806382109402068342007-06-06T02:54:00.000+01:002007-06-06T02:54:00.000+01:00Long journeys between many existences... H'm. You sound like you have some snake oil to sell, boyo.<BR/><BR/>One wonders why anyone would want "complex outcomes" either. I do like the three-circles.Fredhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14147714446076460699[email protected]tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8686769.post-56616188797454092762007-06-05T11:09:00.000+01:002007-06-05T11:09:00.000+01:00We know it jeremy but do we do it? l think we were born to die and everything we do unconciously is in fulfilment of that sentence. It is only the things done in enlightned conciousness that can delay, ease or triump over the journey to death. Note how friggin hard those are.Funmi Iyandahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13943233329336056807[email protected]tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8686769.post-80942506538360631072007-06-05T10:08:00.000+01:002007-06-05T10:08:00.000+01:00This is interesting and makes some sense. I can see many more people adopting this perspective in the future.<BR/>Great post!The Pseudo-Independenthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01992276117548193938[email protected]