Haven't they got anything better to do?
Senators discussed the possibility of imposing a 6 month jail term for public nudity in the Upper House yesterday. It would be interesting to see a copy of the Bill to see how nudity/dress is defined. Would wearing of spaghetti tops warrant 6 months in the clink? How about the partial showing of knee or shoulder? There's very little sentient analysis of the discussion, so start here but don't expect any enlightenment.
Posts
5 comments:
Jeremy, I think there's a clue in the article, with Senators INSISTING on stiffer punishment for nudity.
The stiffer the better I say, chaps!
Just as you said it: "Haven't they got anything better to do"?
This is ridiculous. Absolutely Farcical. When will it end? Isn't there any rep. or senator with the sense to speak against this and rally others behind her/him? Common!
Please don't mock.
This is a topical issue.
Very intelligent sermon by my pastor sums it up nicely.
the answer is no, they obviously have nothing better to do
Post a Comment